Filed in Books & Media

Points of Departure: Zen Buddhism With a Rinzai View

By Eido T. ShimanoLou Nordstrom

POINTS OF DEPARTURE: Zen Buddhism With a Rinzai View
By Eido T. Shimano.
The Zen Studies Society Press: Livingston Manor, New York, 1991.
190 pp. $17.00 (hardcover), $12.00 (paperback).

When formal Zen practice began in earnest in this country in the sixties, the Rinzai Zen emphasis on the attainment of enlightenment-experience (kensho) served as the dominant model of practice. More recently, it would seem that Soto Zen has become the more dominant school, in part because of its deemphasis of kensho and its emphasis on the fact of original enlightenment.

Yet, if Soto Zen's popularity has anything to do with endorsing he growing tendency among Zen students to practice as if enlightenment-experience has nothing to do with Zen, then it's time for a Rinzai revival.

One of the more impressive achievements of Points of Depar­ture is the way Eido Roshi balances the traditional Rinzai Zen insistence on the importance of kensho with realistic assess­ments of the scope of the transfor­mation involved. For example:

Generally speaking, we are not strong. We are rather greedy and rather lazy. We are fearful, and we have confusions and anxieties. But when we can testify to, and sense, see, and feel buddha nature itself, these inner anxieties will be allayed. The reason why our anxi­ety is so acute is that we don't know what we really are. Once that is settled by realizing true Buddha nature, we can calm down. There may still be greed, jealousy, anger, and other problems result­ing both from our past habits and from karma, but one essential problem is solved.

One of the reasons for the above­-mentioned shift from Rinzai to Soto may be the false advertising associ­ated with kensho—moral perfection, psychological health, etc.

The book is divided into four parts: I: The Subtleties of Buddha Nature; II: Growth; III: Commen­taries on Rinzai Zen Practice; and IV: Teishos in the Rinzai Spirit. The two best talks in Part I are inspired by two marvelous haiku by Soen Roshi:

All beings are flowers,
in a blooming universe.


Crawling out of the Dead Sea,
My body,
Glittering spring water.

The talk in Part II entitled "Appreciating the Fourfold Wisdom" is the best commentary I have come across on the koan called "The Woman Comes Out of Samadhi" (The Gateless Gate, Case 42). One of Eido Roshi's distinctive talents is a powerful appreciation of what might be called "Dharma Drama"; this was unquestionably true of his teacher, Soen Roshi, and is the hallmark of the Rinzai Roku. The spirit of Rinzai, and thus of Rinzai Zen, embodies a way of teaching called "Soshi Zen"—no verbal, intellec­tual understanding or explana­tion, just dynamic presentation; the other way of teaching is called "Nyorai Zen," which is the more verbal, intellectual understanding of Buddhadharma. Although Eido Roshi clearly wishes to advocate the essential importance of Soshi Zen, in a way, by characterizing his book as a Rinzai view, he subtly does himself a disservice; for what may be truly distinctive about his matured Zen style of teaching is that it balances—or at least aspires to balance—both Soshi and Nyorai Zen. Of these teaching styles he sagely remarks: "We cannot say which is better; we need both."

Parts III and IV give the reader the strong, vital taste of Rinzai Zen and make this book the strong, vital text it is. I was particularly struck by Eido Roshi's remarks on the famous koan (Blue Cliff Record, Case 11), "Don't you know that in all the land of Tang there is no Zen teacher?" Many Zen teachers, of course, talk about this koan, but for obvious reasons might think twice about actually convincing their students that there are no teachers of Zen. What struck me as I read his remarks was simply that he really meant what he was saying. In 1976 when I left Dai Bosatsu Zendo, I vividly recall Eido Roshi's saying to me, "There is no teacher but zazen." Frankly, the remark did not ring true to me at the time, and now, even he might agree. In this regard in "Who Is The Teacher," he writes:

But there is no teacher, as such, for you to rely on but yourself. Yourself. This is a unique part of the Zen tradition. In some other traditions it may be said that someone teaches something to the student.... But from the essential viewpoint, there is no giver, no receiver, no donation. The giver is shunyata, the receiver is shunyata, the dona­tion is shunyata. Teaching is also shunyata. To realize this by your own effort is called Zen practice and Zen realization.... Now here is a subtle point. It is said that sutra reading is unimportant. But it says that in the sutras. Unless you study the sutras, you will not understand the insignifi­cance of studying the sutras. It is this way with a Zen teacher. Unless you have studied with a teacher, you will not understand the importance of depending upon yourself. So you should do both: you should study with a teacher, and you should recog­nize the limited role of the teacher. You are the student, and you are the teacher.

Lou Nordstrom, a Zen monk, teaches philosophy and Zen and edited Namu Dai Bosa: A Transmission of Zen Buddhism to America (Theater Arts Books, 1976).


Share with a Friend

Email to a Friend

Already a member? Log in to share this content.

You must be a Tricycle Community member to use this feature.

1. Join as a Basic Member

Signing up to Tricycle newsletters will enroll you as a free Tricycle Basic Member.You can opt out of our emails at any time from your account screen.

2. Enter Your Message Details

Enter multiple email addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Richard Fidler's picture

In view of the possibly criminal behavior of Eido Shimano (inappropriate behavior with his female students), it is entirely reasonable to ask if Enlightenment changes one into a fine human being. Does that experience necessarily make a person kinder, more compassionate, less likely to hurt others? If the answer is "no", then what is the point of the koans? Is it better to be unenlightened, contributing to the welfare of humanity and all living things or is it better to seek Enlightenment? Of course, you can do both, but energy spent in the Zendo could very well be spent helping those that need help. It is all a matter of how you use the finite amount of energy available to you.

There is little credible evidence Buddha insisted on an awakening experience like that advocated by Zen Buddhists--an experience that requires one to receive inka, approval, by a Zen master before becoming a teacher. The koan method of teaching was unknown in India at the time of the Buddha; it grew out of Chinese tradition. The Zen teaching that there is an unbroken line of enlightenment experiences leading from Gautama to masters of the present day is probably a myth. It is not grounded solidly in history since other Buddhist traditions do not recognize it.

None of this is intended to besmirch Zen. The question is about balance: Should students turn all their energy towards koans, sesshins, and hours of zazen or should Zen be practiced in a more gentle, restrained way? Mindfulness, after all, is just one component of the Eightfold Path and zazen and koans make up only a small part of it. If this all-consuming desire for Enlightenment gets in the way of other components of the Eightfold Path (such as right conduct), a person might very well wind up committing crimes against other people--or, at least, shaming them and insulting them. This is a topic that should be considered by all Zen Buddhists. It occupies me.