March 27, 2008

More thinkin' 'bout a boycott; Will sponsor Coke be pressured to back off the Games next?

Time for a boycott? Not yet, says the Economist:

BERLIN, Tokyo, Mexico, Moscow, Los Angeles, Seoul: the Olympic games are often “political” events, occasions for the flaunting of national progress, or for protesters to enjoy global publicity. The Beijing Olympics this August were never going to be any different. Indeed, when it competed for the right to play host to the games, China used a political argument: that this would help China's “reform and opening”. But the games are now overshadowed by the spectre of nationalist unrest in Tibet and China's unyielding response to it. In some Western countries there have been calls for governments to back a boycott of the games. To heed such calls now would be misguided.

It would not only be counterproductive, encouraging a more intense frenzy of the xenophobic Chinese nationalism foreign reporting of events in Tibet has already provoked (see, for example, some of the comments on our own website). It would also mean relinquishing one of the best levers the outside world has had in recent years over China's government: its obsession with making a success of the Beijing Olympics.

Will Coke be pressured to back off the Olympics? Coke is a co-sponsor of the torch relay. (And is the picture on this link a joke?)

Bush asks the Chinese to talk with the DL, whom the Chinese label a liar.

Police in troubled Nepal threaten Tibetan exiles with deportation (which equals torture and death.)

More protests in Greece, in the nation's second city, Thessaloniki.

Share with a Friend

Email to a Friend

Already a member? Log in to share this content.

You must be a Tricycle Community member to use this feature.

1. Join as a Basic Member

Signing up to Tricycle newsletters will enroll you as a free Tricycle Basic Member.You can opt out of our emails at any time from your account screen.

2. Enter Your Message Details

Enter multiple email addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Gerald Ford's picture

Ha ha ha, I didn't even know there was a high-priestess of the Olympic Games. Obviously, the ceremony means something only to die-hard Olympic fans. That, and if you read the article carefully, the ceremony is something artificially scripted by some corporate promotion of the Olympics. :D