February 22, 2008

On Being and Not Being a Buddhist

Woodmoor Village points us to this post on the Washington Post's On Faith section.

I am not a Buddhist. I've never told anyone that I am a Buddhist and have in fact denied the title on more than one occasion. Even though I have been circling around the stupa for the last ten years, I have never made any formal or official commitment to the Buddha sāsana. I've never sown a rakusu or received a "dharma name." I am, as of this moment, a freelance wanderer through the six realms of samsara.

Share with a Friend

Email to a Friend

Already a member? Log in to share this content.

You must be a Tricycle Community member to use this feature.

1. Join as a Basic Member

Signing up to Tricycle newsletters will enroll you as a free Tricycle Basic Member.You can opt out of our emails at any time from your account screen.

2. Enter Your Message Details

Enter multiple email addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Philip Ryan's picture

Yes, we all know labels can be hurtful and limiting, but there is something to this essay that reminds me of a man saying, "Yes, I have sex with other men, but I'm not gay!"

A Freelance Wanderer Through the Six Realms of Samsara « 初菩提's picture

[...] A Freelance Wanderer Through the Six Realms of Samsara On Being and Not Being a Buddhist: [...]

Scott's picture

I had the same reaction, GF. I thought, well if he doesn't want to call himself a Buddhist I guess he doesn't have to. But he's doing everything "a Buddhist" has traditionally done.

This is one of the reasons I'm interested to the see the results of the Pew research report mentioned here a couple of days ago and due out on Monday. If there are people like this kid out there who don't call themselves Buddhists, how does that effect polls like the Pew? Interested statistical problem for studying Buddhists in this country.

Gerald Ford's picture

I take refuge in the three jewels. I ring a Tibetan singing bowl three times. I place my hands in the mudra of Vairocana Buddha.

How does taking refuge in the three jewels not make him a Buddhist? Just because he doesn't want to be affiliated with a particular sect, lineage or organization doesn't invalidate him as a Buddhist. All Buddhist teachings revolve around taking refuge in the three jewels (Buddha, Dharma and Sangha), and he pays homage to Mahavairocana, which isn't just a part-time dabbler's practice. I really don't understand his point.

Can someone please clarify?