December 11, 2007

Eat Local?

Despite Europe's interest in eating local foods to reduce food miles, "Europeans are eating — and importing — more food from outside the E.U. than ever before," according to DotEarth, a New York Times blog. In May the Times of London reported:

Scottish prawns are being hand-shelled in China, Atlantic haddock caught off Scotland is being prepared in Poland and Welsh cockles are being sent to Holland to be put in jars before going on sale in Britain.

Eating local is simply not possible in a world of 6.7 billion people (and counting) says Andrew Revkin, who writes the blog. So what to do? Find alternative, less-polluting fuel sources. Too bad we have to wait until 1/21/09 to start putting that into practice.

What is wrong with Americans? Why don't we realize we're hurting ourselves and our children by eating mass-produced junk and not demanding more from our food suppliers? Local food seller Jamey Lionette says:

I think that because of the Depression (when there was no money to spend on food) and World War II (when there was rationing and everyone was focused on the war effort) Americans lost their taste-buds. Along came the mass-produced foods of the 1950s at cheap prices. Supermarkets were a "progressive" thing, as suburban living was progressive. Rural culture and production was frowned upon as old-fashioned and primitive. Food from all over the world suddenly became available and at prices lower than local food. Protecting America's foreign interest, the beginning of what we now call globalization, became a new form of colonialism. Foreign resources, raw materials as well as labor, were now easily exploitable by the nation's new superpower status. As the economy grew, money filtered down to the managerial and to some of the working class and was coupled with an influx of cheap products made cheaply and available to most classes of the U.S. Consumerism took off.

He also says Whole Foods and their competitors will ruin the local food movement by dropping prices so low. And:

If you could witness how most of our food is produced, you would not eat it; you would be outraged. We are so far removed from our food.

Well worth a read if you're interested in this issue. And did you know the Dalai Lama once planted a tree on Prince Charles' organic farm in Gloucestershire? And here's an interesting U.S. drought monitor. (Who's making the drought worse in the southeastern U.S. by the way? No one but those darn government fat cats with their coercive regulations.)

- Philip Ryan, Web Editor

Share with a Friend

Email to a Friend

Already a member? Log in to share this content.

You must be a Tricycle Community member to use this feature.

1. Join as a Basic Member

Signing up to Tricycle newsletters will enroll you as a free Tricycle Basic Member.You can opt out of our emails at any time from your account screen.

2. Enter Your Message Details

Enter multiple email addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Erg's picture

I don't get it the beef. If Whole Foods Mart can make prices low enought o be competitive with less healthy food, I say great. The truth is msot of the worlds population and the US can't eat local from a logistical standpoint much less an economic one. It is just a regionalist, elitist thing. I am glad Whole Foods Mart does what it does, and I am glad big box competitors are trying to compete with them now, driving prices down further. That is the only way we are going to eat less junk. In a country of 300 million people food HAS to be mass produced.