letters

  • Tricycle Community 0 comments

    Letters to the Editor Paid Member

    Hop Hop Hooray Thank you so much for the wonderful interview with Jeffrey Hopkins [Summer 1996], reading which I was inspired to consider the implications of imaginary sexual contact with “a man” as some functional identification—in mutuality—with that “generic” image as such. Hal PappsSan Francisco, CaliforniaMore of Tricycle’s supposedly white elite liberal readership speaks out: I have received two copies of your magazine and both had articles written by (or about) admitted homosexuals.I do not pay my money to take up the cause of homosexuals. I will not renew my subscription. W. W. HasseyMontgomery, Alabama More »
  • Tricycle Community 0 comments

    Letters to the Editor Paid Member

    DOCTORS AND DEATH More »
  • Tricycle Community 0 comments

    Letters to the Editor Fall 2005 Paid Member

    HANKIES OR KLEENEX? More »
  • Tricycle Community 0 comments

    Letters to the Editor Paid Member

    Letters from Tricycle readers... More »
  • Tricycle Community 0 comments

    Letters to the Editor Spring 1995 Paid Member

    Go Bill! I read Tricycle from cover to cover and don't understand ninety percent of what I read; but the ten percent I do understand helps me "deal with life" one day at a time (hopefully with more kindness for others). Perhaps next year I'll understand twelve percent. Bill KrumbeinSanta Rosa, California Food for Thought As a vegetarian for twenty-five years, I would like to say [in response to "Meat: To Eat it or Not: A Debate on Food and Practice," Winter 1994] that Buddhism should not be associated directly with vegetarianism. To make vegetarianism a precondition for practicing the dharma is putting the cart before the bullock. More »
  • Tricycle Community 0 comments

    Letters to the Editor Paid Member

    Down By Law Regarding the ten-million-dollar lawsuit against Sogyal Rinpoche for sexual abuse [Spring 1995 In the News]: While Sogyal Rinpoche remains innocent until or unless proven guilty, whether or not he is within the ignoble category of teachers who misuse their spiritual authority is a question that has now been overwhelmed by the lawsuit itself. I am sympathetic to the lawsuit for the simple reason that no one seems able to come up with another solution to this regrettable situation and because I share with so many other women the frustration and anger which surfaces in the face of teachers who continue to indulge sexual appetites at the expense of their students. But bringing a lawsuit raises other issues as well. And I wonder if, in the long run, the price might be too high to pay. More »