Dharma Wars

What is it about the Internet that turns Buddhist teachers into bullies?

By Zenshin Michael Haederle

Dharma Wars

The trouble seems to have started last February, when Gomyo Kevin Seperic, a graffiti artist and Shingon monk affiliated with the Sitting Frog Zen Sangha in Phoenix, went public about a disagreement he was having with its abbot, Dogo Barry Graham, over Graham’s authority to teach. On his Hoodie Monk blog, Seperic said,

How many Sitting Frog Zen Sangha teachers does it take to change a light bulb? Not two, apparently. I’ve just been kicked out of the Sitting Frog Zen Sangha for asking Dogo to show me his inka. Huh....The cheese stands alone.

Soon, the Zen teacher Kobutsu Kevin Malone, with whom Seperic and Graham had both been affiliated, added a comment to Seperic’s post, in which he acknowledged that it was a “a serious error in judgment” on his part to have agreed to serve as Graham’s teacher without checking his credentials. “It has become increasingly apparent that Barry is in serious difficulty and that his words and actions have become increasingly erratic and delusional,” Malone wrote.

A few days later, it was Graham’s turn. “I have been the subject of some scurrilous rumor-mongering by a couple of former friends and colleagues,” he wrote on his own blog. Graham went on to allege that one of his accusers (he omitted the names) had been convicted of assault, and that the other’s own teaching credentials were fabricated.

The flurry of charges and counter-charges between Graham, Seperic, and Malone over inka—the authorization to teach in the Rinzai tradition of Zen—played out before an online audience, quickly blossoming into a fullon dharma smackdown that drew 171 partisan comments from Hoodie Monk readers. But a few found the whole thing painful to watch. The reader rg1313 commented:

The fact that three zen masters have to air there [sic] dirty laundry on blog sites seems a little childish. . . . You teachers are supposed to be role models for our practice not a buddhist sitcom.

Indeed. If any newcomers exploring an interest in Zen had stumbled upon the fray, they wouldn’t have been inspired. With Buddhist virtues like compassion and right speech in short supply, the whole affair looked more like a schoolyard brawl than enlightened discourse between experienced dharma teachers and students. Unfortunately, the Sitting Frog squabble was hardly unique. In the era of Internet blogging and online forums with their unfiltered, rapidfire exchanges, disagreements among Buddhist teachers and practitioners seem to erupt out of nowhere.

It’s hardly news that Buddhists sometimes disagree— there is a long and colorful history of Buddhist teachers debating one another, often quite forcefully, over their understanding of the dharma. And American Buddhism has weathered its share of internecine conflicts, including sex scandals, financial shenanigans, and power abuses. What has changed in the past few years is that some Buddhists are now accustomed to casual online mudslinging and name-calling—in short, behaving just as badly as everyone else on the Internet.

“People say and do things online that they wouldn’t ordinarily say and do in person,” says John Suler, a psychology professor at Rider University, in Lawrenceville, New Jersey, who has studied computer users’ behavior for years. Buddhist or not, Internet users readily fall prey to what Suler calls the “online disinhibition effect.” The medium itself drives much of this acting out, he says. “People experience their computers and online environments as an extension of their selves—even as an extension of their minds—and therefore feel free to project their inner dialogues, transferences, and conflicts into their exchanges with others in cyberspace.”

One might suppose that Buddhists, with their mandate to realize no-self and manifest lovingkindness, would be able to navigate such pitfalls a bit more skillfully than most Internet users. But Suler, who has some familiarity with Buddhism—in 1993, he published a book titled “Contemporary Psychoanalysis and Eastern Thought”—isn’t surprised that teachers and students get carried away online.

Comments

Really

Us bloggers are less than Buddhist because we cuss, because we disagree or, God forbid we stick our thumb at the corporate dogs that milk the people who's only wish is to learn more about the Buddha Dharma?

Hey, if you all want rainbows and unicorns, Triycle is the place for you. its where no bad things happen to good buddhists. If you want to talk about how life can be so dirty, confusing and painful, the real world Buddhist bloggers is for you.

The choice is not as easy as you may think, but then again, suffering ain't a choice is it?

This is the same argument I have with some Christians

I come from a Christian background. When I used to get into difficulty in life, I was frequently given some trite answer like "I don't have enough faith" or that "I need to read my Bible more".

In their world, everything is sparkly and nice, and advancing your spiritual growth is as simple as buying the latest worship album.

Tricycle serves a specific market - there isn't anything wrong with that, and if that is the case, there is certainly nothing wrong with cussing, disagreeing, corporate thumb sticking bloggers in the real world, suffering with their very real lives.

No choice in the suffering maybe, but definately in how we deal with it. =)

Regards,

Frank
Stop Smoking Weed Blog

Tricycle, on the other hand

hasn't exactly produced a critique of why Dennis Genpo Merzel's "Big MindTM" technique might be considered "controversal," although obviously anyone can search online as to why.

Warner's speech might be childish and ill-considered, but that doesn't mean there's not a valid criticism there.

There's much to criticize Warner for writing and saying and doing, but it doesn't mean his criticisms lack merit.

 

On the other hand, if anyone expects on-line Buddhists to be role models, well, that ain't the Buddhism I practice, even on line.

Idiot!

You drooling idiot, you moron, you fool, you've no clue what you're talking about...

(Just kidding.)

The subtle source is clear and bright
The tributary streams flow through the darkness

http://vernontbludgeon.com/blog/

I don't know.  It ain't

I don't know.  It ain't pretty, but the history of Zen is filled with one teacher calling another bogus.  I think of Dogen writing about Dahui, or in more recent times the Korean Zen masters Kusan and SongChol trading barbs over the handful of mountains that separated them.  It's ugly, sure, and it's always been ugly, but it also probably helps keeps us all a bit more honest.  The internet just makes it more visible, like with Brad Warner taking shots at a Big Mind, and the author of this internet article taking thinly veiled shots at Brad in an article about how, ostensibly, we shouldn't take shots at each other on the internet.

I have to say that the thought of everyone needing to be a quiet little Buddhist is kinda scary (even though most of us do tend to just step around the dogshit since there's only so much time in the day).  You mean that merely claiming Dharma transmission online, for instance, should protect you from anyone even investigating those claims, to say nothing of being able to say whether or not they found those claims to be empty?  Or that if you re-package some New Age this-or-that and call it Buddhism, you should be above any scrutiny just because you called it "Buddhism"? 

Is this what we're calling Right Speech?

Vince Cousino Anila

James Ure and The Buddhist Blog

I am the author of "The Buddhist Blog" mentioned in the article and I would have hoped for the author to have contacted me before using my words. As well as ask me for a comment on his article. Anyway, I have never claimed to be a teacher, master, monk, rinpoche, ordained or enlightened. If you read in my profile it states that I'm just an average practitioner trying to travel the path on the middle way.

The reason I reacted to Twisted Branch was because of the aggressive manner in which he leveled his criticism. I don't mind criticism but since I'm not a Buddha or Bodhisattva I still get hurt when people I don't know attack me for being something that I am not. So of course I'd do what any red blooded person still struggling with samsara would do -- defend themselves and their blog. I have worked had to establish my blog as one of the top blogs addressing Buddhism today. That said this doesn't make me an expert but a kind of "Buddhist columnist." I don't appreciate being attacked and my integrity as a Buddhist questioned just like you probably wouldn't like it either.

We Buddhist bloggers are often attacked my mainstreat columnists for Buddhist magazines but what makes our columns any more controversial and misinformed that some of the ones I've read in these magazines? I've read editorials and articles in your magazine and in other places that are pretty out there. So this isn't just a blogosphere thing.

I titled my blog, "The Buddhist Blog" not because I think it is the last word on Buddhism but frankly because I couldn't think of anything else as a title!! I didn't realize that it was causing such a stir amongst people. I guess I should change it to "A Buddhist Blog" so as not to offend anyone but I have had that title since the beginning and changing it would only confuse my readers. I honestly didn't think it would be that big of a deal to people. Maybe I should put it to a vote on the blog. I try really hard to be a fair minded but passionate blogger and I try hard to write posts that show the peaceful side of Buddhism but I will defend myself when attacked. And being still human I will say some controversial things from time to time.

I feel as though you misrepresented my blog is adding this quote after the exchange between Twisted Branch and myself:

“People who purportedly are teachers—whether they’ve been given transmission or not—are seen as Zen authorities online,” she says. “Sometimes students get swept into currents of basically malevolent speech. How can that be what the Buddha taught? I’m very concerned about it.”

Again, I'm not purported to be a teacher. I go to great lengths to say this in many of my posts as people who regularly read my blog know. I can't be responsible if people consider me an authority because I don't claim such a title. I simply put forth what I'm thinking about on issues involving Buddhism. As well as how my practice is going, etc. "If ego is wrapped in opinion" which it might be to a degree then aren't you just as guilty as you claim some of us bloggers are? We're not Bodhisattvas in the Buddhosblogosphere -- we're just average folks trying to figure out the Dharma in our day to day lives. We don't always represent the Dharma best but then again neither do many who write in your magazine and other Buddhist magazines. We all just try to do our best.

Again, I really hoped that you would have contacted me for a response given that you mentioned me and that exchange in your article. You didn't even contact me to tell me I was being mentioned. I would have expected more from your magazine.

The good heart is the way...

“Be kind whenever possible. It is always possible.” Dalai Lama

Surely if you are considering posting a critical comment, why not first meditate on it and then refine your statement so that it will not be percieved as a personal criticism?

Also, I would say that If you consider or present yourself as a Buddhist then it is most important to act as a role model - leadership is always by example.

I feel as though you

I feel as though you misrepresented my blog is adding this quote after the exchange between Twisted Branch and myself sci-fi movie downloads

well ...........

In my search to understand Buddhism, I've read alot of things.  Some great information, some ridiculously flowery speech that I couldn't understand and some absolute garbage.  In Warner's first book, he mentioned "questioning authority" including himself.  Wise words though I wouldn't call them humble.  As far as these warring personalities,  His Holiness (yeah, that guy) says in one of his books:  My enemy is my greatest teacher.  I DON'T understand the middle way yet though I hope to at some point, but when it's put that simply even I get it.

(The act of) Compassion benefits the practitioner most .........

Thanks for the moment

RE

I have to agree with you

web hosting

Aaron

Reproduction of material from any Tricycle pages without written
permission is strictly prohibited. ©2010 Tricycle.com

Tricycle: The Buddhist Review
92 Vandam Street, New York, NY 10013
Subscription Inquiries 800.873.9871 | Advertising Inquiries 510.548.1680 | Editorial Inquiries 212.645.1143 | Fax 212.645.1493

For Sustaining Members and Digital Subscribers Only

Tricycle Online Retreat content is available to Tricycle Community Sustaining Members and Tricycle digital subscribers only. If you'd like to become a Sustaining Member, please click here.

Learn more about Tricycle Sustaining Membership

Already a Member? Log in here