The Myth of the Experienced Meditator
After thirty years of practice, one meditator finds it's gotten him nowhere. That's just fine with him.
I tell Kyodo Roshi I want to take my practice to a deeper level. "Deeper level?" He laughs again. "What do you mean, 'deeper'? Zen practice only one level. No deep, understand?"
I AM, UNFORTUNATELY, an experienced meditator. From the time I stumbled into an introduction to Transcendental Meditation in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, in 1970, through multiple eras (including my present fifteen-year-old Soto Zen practice), I've sat and stared at many walls (and mandalas and candles, and the inside of my eyelids) reveled in sundry bells-and-whistles mental experiences, gotten bored, decided I was going crazy, become enlightened (no, really!), and now I'm ready to share everything I've learned. It won't take long. In fact I can sum it up in one word: nothing.
Not that "nothing" is to be sniffed at. For years—decades!—I thought there was something to learn, and that all those thousands of hours on the mat were cumulative, that the more I sat, the more aware and compassionate and wonderful I would become. In a world where the attainment of goals is seen as a virtue, thirty-eight years of realizing nothing didn't come easily or lightly.
By definition (mine), if I did think I knew something about meditation, that wouldn't be meditation. Sort of like God—if you can describe God to me, that ain't God. If, as I believe, meditation is simply awareness, then any past knowledge I have about it is not only useless, but slops over into my immediate experience. Knowing is antithetical to openness, and it's the adventure of not knowing that's the genius of meditation. Not for nothing (so to speak) are two of the most popular contemporary books on Buddhism called Beginner's Mind (Shunryu Suzuki) and Only Don't Know (Seung Sahn). I have this fantasy that next time I open my copies of these books, I'll find only blank pages.
So what is meditation about? I've heard many claims for the practice over the years, that it's about: gratitude; emptiness; deepened, (or if you prefer) heightened, awareness; compassion; spaciousness; the discovery/realization/dissolving of one's true self (your choice); attaining liberation; self-realization; being present in the moment; opening to the wonder of it all; finding inner peace; encountering one's Buddha nature; becoming one with everything; cutting through delusion; fill in the blank.
It seems to me, though, that meditation isn't about anything: meditation is meditation. Any attempt to define it in terms of something else simply confuses the issue, making it vulnerable to being treated like any other self-improvement system. Lord knows, these days we are offered enough ways to be better people, get closer to God, find ourselves, and enhance our circumstances. We're swamped with therapies, self-help books, and techniques—what musician and activist Bob Geldof called "the thriving economy of psychotherapists, designer religions, and spiritual boutiques"—which treat our lives as projects to be tweaked and fixed. Isn't meditation (if it's anything at all) a relief from all this? Isn't it the opposite of repairing and adjusting and striving and perpetually wanting things to be different?
For me, meditation is a haven away from the ubiquitous world of self-improvement. It's not just that there's no such thing as "bad" meditation, but there's no such thing as "good" meditation either. It is what it is. So when I hear words like "effort" and "discipline" and phrases like "deepening one's practice" and "advancing along the spiritual path" spoken in the same breath as the word "meditation," I wince. Just sitting (shikantaza)—doing and wanting nothing, breath coming and going unbidden, eyes seeing, ears hearing—in this effortless state, thoughts flurry like falling leaves.
So can a so-called experienced meditator offer anything to someone new to the practice? Probably not. If what we're really talking about is awareness, how can we help someone notice what's going on? This is what's going on: no more, no less. Unlike a subject like, say, carpentry, where we learn from the experience of those who have gone before us, meditation is defined by spontaneity, by not knowing. As the Roshi says, "practice only one level." Perhaps the best we can do is to reassure newcomers that each of us starts over with every sitting and every breath.
Trust me. I'm an experienced meditator.
Barry Evans is a member of the Arcata (California) Zen Group and also sits with Akira Kasai, in Guanajuato, Mexico. He isn't quite sure why he meditates, but he does anyway.
image: © R. Taylor L.M.P.A.


Comments
Ridiculous
There is no excuse for this intellectual laziness.
The Buddha gave meditation instructions several times in the Pali Canon; they are available free online.
If you have gained nothing in 30 years, maybe it is time to look at another system.
The Myth of the experienced meditator
jennifercj
I loved your article! I especially liked the ending which was a beginning for me. "each of us starts over with every sitting and every breath" I am a newcomer and I feel that I always will be. I did not realize until reading your article that I WAS looking at meditation as a self-help mode. I wanted to learn compassion , how to relax, how to not feel fear, how to slow my life down, how not to be afraid of death,etc, Meditation does something but I cannot put it into words and it certainly did not do any of the above. But to say it does nothing is also not correct. It does do a lot of something. What that something is ,I have no idea but it does it. One gets terribly bogged down with words and definitions. Meditation is not cognitive. It is different that words, for me at least. Anyway, thank you so much for writing this article. Jennifer Jameson
jennifercj
Meditation
Thank you for this honest approach to meditation. Meditation has always been a confusing exercise to me. I have never been able to understand how a person's mind can just go "blank." casino online
The myth of the experienced meditator
This is the kind of talk that could scare away potential meditators. A lot of folks are looking for precisely that which Evans says they "shouldn't" look for: compassion, relaxation, stress relief. So what? Who is to say one should or shouldn't look for something (or nothing) in meditation? The goals and wishes that some folks start out with can change over time. This piece is too preachy and holier-than-thou for my taste.