May 28, 2010

Less religion, more practice

Jack Kornfield, Los Angeles TimesThe Los Angeles Times reports that Jack Kornfield is in Los Angeles this weekend to give a talk on CG Jung's journals at the Armand Hammer Museum and to lead a three-hour meditation retreat at InsightLA. Kornfield, a psychologist and former Thai monk, has written extensively about Western psychology and Buddhist mindfulness practice. Trudy Goodman, LAInsight's lead teacher, tells the Times, "I feel that Jack has changed Buddhism by being a pioneer for the inclusion of our emotional lives in the practice."

"More and more, we're teaching meditation not as a religious activity but as a support for living a wise and healthy and compassionate inner life," Kornfield said recently. "A number of the people I teach don't consider themselves Buddhists, which is absolutely fine with me. It's much better to become a Buddha than a Buddhist."

"Less religion, more practice," is how the Times puts it. Here's an interview I conducted with Jack in 2008. I'll soon be posting an earlier interview with him that Tricycle founder Helen Tworkov conducted in 2000—interesting to see the progression in thought and practice.

Photo: Christine Alicino, 2008

Share with a Friend

Email to a Friend

Already a member? Log in to share this content.

You must be a Tricycle Community member to use this feature.

1. Join as a Basic Member

Signing up to Tricycle newsletters will enroll you as a free Tricycle Basic Member.You can opt out of our emails at any time from your account screen.

2. Enter Your Message Details

Enter multiple email addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
jjwalker7730's picture

Here is a revision of Jung's thoughts since "Psychology and Religion, East and West", where he changed.
Jung’s Final Experience
This lecture was delivered at the C. G. Jung Institute of Los Angeles in 2003
as part of a series on mortificatio, the alchemical process of psychological
or inner death inherent in such diminishing experiences as depression,
illness, failure, aging, and dying.
Good evening.
“Death,” Jung wrote in 1945 not long after his heart attack, “is the
hardest thing from the outside and as long as we are outside of it. But once
inside you taste of such completeness and peace and fulfillment that you
don’t want to return.”1 Jung was speaking here of his out-of-body, neardeath
experience, whose gripping effect indeed made it difficult for him to
return to the world of everyday life even though he resiliently recovered
from his illness. He remarked how “life has fortunately become provisional.
It has become a transitory prejudice, a working hypothesis for the time
being, but not existence itself.”
Well, Jung lived seventeen more years after this experience, making
the most out of this life which he now saw so provisionally and transitorily.
He produced some of his most important works, and had several insights
further deepening his understanding of the psyche. When death did finally
come to claim him, he was prepared. He knew his health was failing, as he
had had two strokes shortly before, and he had also had two or three dreams
announcing that the end was near. Indeed, he was looking forward to his
death in a curious, almost eager way. The family and friends who were
present during his final days all observed how peaceful and clear-headed he
was. “Quick!,” he said to his son when his housekeeper momentarily left the
room the evening before he died. “Help me out of bed before she comes
back or she’ll stop me. I want to look at the sunset.” Wishing to celebrate
his passing as a special occasion, his last words to his housekeeper were,
“Let’s have a really good wine tonight.”
The experience of dying as a conscious, creative act has become a
focus of interest in recent times as people are more and more recognizing it
1 Laurens van der Post, Jung and the Story of Our Time (letter to Kristine Mann), Hogarth Press, London,
1976, p. 255.
as the final, culminating act of life itself, the crowning event for which one’s
whole life has in a certain way been a preparation. How different this is
from the attitude expressed by Woody Allen: “I have no problem with
dying,” he said, “as long as I’m not there when it happens.”
Dying consciously brings up the related idea of living life with a
consciousness of death. Becoming aware of our mortality in more than just
the detached manner with which we usually tend to think about it can help
us appreciate the here-and-now, the fullness of the moment—or indeed,
whether this moment really is as full as it could be. This kind of
contemplation sharpens us to the quality of our lives and the choices we
make. As Dr. Johnson said, the prospect of death wonderfully concentrates
the mind. For this reason do Thai Buddhist monks meditate in graveyards
where the recently deceased are being cremated. Jung’s own experiences
nearly dying and while dying—how his mind was concentrated—brought
him to some interesting discoveries, and evidently, a revision of his views on
Eastern religion and Zen in particular. This then brings us to our present
topic, Jung’s Zen experience in his final days. To begin, it is important to
first have some understanding of what makes a Zen experience distinct from
other kinds of religious experience.
* * * *
In the mystical traditions of all the major world religions, there have evolved
disciplines that attempt to cultivate a state of mind in which the mysterium
tremendum, or awe-inspiring mystery of the divine, can manifest and
flourish. In Western religions, the predominant discipline has been prayer,
though in alchemy, an underground current of Western religion, the chief
method involved a meditation upon the transmutation of material substances
(for example, turning lead into gold). Jung showed that this external focus
was a psychic projection of inner transformation. In Eastern religion, the
predominant discipline has been meditation directly focused on transforming
the psyche itself. Though there are many schools and methods, their aims
tend to be similar: to transcend the limitations of ego-consciousness and
allow a deeper consciousness—a consciousness of the Absolute (regardless
of which name it is known by)—to emerge.
In Zen, it is less important what the discipline is than what the quality
of discipline invested is. This fluid attitude allows Zen practitioners to
encounter the Absolute through a variety of disciplines—calligraphy, tea
ceremony, pottery making, bamboo flute music, flower arrangement, haiku
poetry, archery, and swordfighting—as easily as through zazen or sitting
meditation, the most common form of Zen discipline. Though I should say
that these disciplines are anything but easy. They usually take many years if
not a lifetime to master. For what is involved is precisely the investment of
a highly refined, focused quality of discipline, of concentration or what Zen
Buddhists call “one-pointedness of mind.” If the one-pointedness of mind is
strong enough, pure enough, and sustained for long enough, the Zen
practitioner becomes so absorbed in the activity of his or her chosen
discipline that the usual boundaries of the ego become extended. If they
become extended enough, there comes a moment when the practitioner
merges not only with the activity, but with the Self as it manifests through
the activity.
This principle expresses the central idea of Zen, the Doctrine of No
Mind. No Mind is also called “Mind,” “Buddha-mind,” “Zen Mind,” “Big
Mind,” the “Self,” the “Void,” the “Unconscious,” and “It.” The “It” here is
not the “It” of Nietzsche or the “id” of Freud (id in Latin means “it”), but the
transpersonal Self. As for the Zen usage of the term “Unconscious,” it is of
special interest.
That Zen is first and foremost a way of understanding the unconscious
is overlooked by many people. As the renowned Zen scholar D.T. Suzuki
writes, “the concept of the unconscious is the foundation of Zen
Buddhism.”2 One may find it discussed at length in the teachings of early
Chinese Zen masters such as Hui-neng and Shen-hui, both of whom lived in
the 7th century. However, the Zen conception of the unconscious clearly
differs from that of most Western psychology, and is remarkably close in
key regards to Jung’s conception. As Suzuki comments, “in Zen Buddhism
the unconscious is not a psychological term either in a narrower or in a
broader sense. . . . [It is] fundamentally different from the psychologists’
Unconscious. It has a metaphysical connotation. When Hui-neng speaks of
the Unconscious in Consciousness, he steps beyond psychology.”3 The
Unconscious in Zen is, simply put, the mind of the cosmos. Suzuki on
occasion calls it the “Cosmic Unconscious.”
Eugen Herrigel offers an illustration of the Zen Unconscious in action
in his book about his years of arduous training in the Zen art of archery. He
recounts an incident in which his teacher told him how he hits the target
without using his eyes. When Herrigel scoffed at this, the master, to prove
his point, allowed Herrigel to set up the target in a practice hall that was
brightly lit but in which the target area was pitch-black, thus making it
impossible for one’s vision to adjust to the darkness and delineate the target.
Herrigel writes: “[The master’s] first arrow shot out of dazzling brightness
2 Zen Buddhism: Selected Writings of D.T. Suzuki, Anchor Books, New York, 1963, p. 16.
3 Ibid., pp. 188, 191.
into deep night. I knew from the sound that it had hit the target. The second
arrow was a hit, too. When I switched on the light in the target-stand, I
discovered to my amazement that the first arrow was lodged full in the
middle of the black [bull’s-eye], while the second arrow had splintered the
butt of the first and plowed through the shaft before embedding itself beside
it.” Explaining his precision, the master said, “It is not ‘I’ who must be
given credit for this shot. ‘It’ shot and ‘It’ made the hit.”4 Of course, the
true goal of any martial art practiced in the Zen spirit is not to achieve
spectacular feats but to attune oneself to the Unconscious, to “It”; winning
against one’s opponent or hitting the target is only a by-product of this inner
In Herrigel’s account, we see certain distinct features typical to the
Zen experience: a merging of the inner with the outer, a merging of the ego
with the Unconscious or the Self, and, very significantly, the occurrence of
all this while one is fully awake and alert as opposed to being in a visionary,
dream, or trance state. There is one other crucial feature that makes Zen
distinct from many other kinds of religious experience. Together with
oneness there occurs the experience of emptiness, what in Buddhism is
called the Void. When the universe is perceived as a single, infinite expanse
with nothing separate in it or beside it to quantify or contrast it to, it has the
sensation of being nothing at all and is hence experienced as a Void. If you
think of the universe as a single sheet of steel, for example, with nothing else
in it, well, soon it has the quality of being like air, empty. Oneness makes
possible emptiness, and vice versa. But one cannot arrive at this truth
merely intellectually. In Zen it must be experienced on a crisp, perceptual,
visceral level; it must be a living experience. Listen to my former Zen
teacher Yamada-roshi as he describes his own enlightenment experience, his
encounter with the Void. This is from a letter he wrote in 1953 before he
became a roshi, that is, a Zen master. It is addressed to the famous Zen
master Nakagawa-roshi with whom he briefly visited:
The day after I called on you I was riding home on the
train with my wife. I was reading a book on Zen by Son-o, who,
you may recall, was a Soto Zen master at the end of the 17th
century. As the train was nearing Ofuna station I ran across this
line: “I came to realize clearly that Mind is no other than
mountains and rivers and the great wide earth, the sun and the
moon and the stars.”
4 Zen in the Art of Archery,Vintage Books, Random House, New York, 1953, 1971, pp. 84-85.
I had read this before, but this time it impressed itself
upon me so vividly that I was startled. I said to myself: “After
seven or eight years of zazen I have finally perceived the
essence of this statement,” and couldn’t suppress the tears that
began to well up. Somewhat ashamed to find myself crying
among the crowd, I averted my face and dabbed at my eyes
with my handkerchief.
. . . it was after 11:30 before I went to bed. At
midnight I abruptly awakened. At first my mind was foggy,
then suddenly that quotation flashed into my consciousness: “I
came to realize clearly that Mind is no other than mountains,
rivers, and the great wide earth, the sun and the moon and the
stars.” And I repeated it. Then all at once I was struck as
though by lightning, and the next instant heaven and earth
crumbled and disappeared. Instantaneously, like surging waves,
a tremendous delight welled up in me, a veritable hurricane of
delight, as I laughed loudly and wildly: “Ha ha ha, ha ha ha!
There’s no reasoning here, no reasoning at all! Ha ha ha!” The
empty sky split in two, then opened its enormous mouth and
began to laugh uproariously: “Ha ha ha!”
. . . Suddenly I sat up and struck the bed with all my might
and beat the floor with my feet, as if trying to smash it, all the
while laughing riotously. My wife and youngest son, sleeping
near to me, were now awake and frightened. Covering my
mouth with her hand, my wife exclaimed: “What’s the matter
with you? What’s the matter with you?” But I wasn’t aware of
this until told about it afterwards. My son told me later he
thought that I had gone mad, that my laughter had sounded
inhuman. When I calmed down I apologized to the rest of the
family, who had come downstairs frightened by the commotion.
That morning I went to see Yasutani-roshi and tried to
describe to him my experience of the sudden disintegration of
heaven and earth. . . . Patting me on the back he said: “Well,
well, it is rare indeed to experience to such a wonderful degree.
It is termed ‘Attainment of the emptiness of Mind.’ You are to
be congratulated!”5
5 Philip Kapleau, Three Pillars of Zen: Teaching, Practice, and Enlightenment, Beacon Press, Boston,
1965, 1967, pp. 205-206.
As one can gather from Yamada-roshi’s account, the experience of the
Void—or as he calls it, empty oneness—is not the nihilistic emptiness of
existentialists such as Sartre. Although it is framed in the Doctrine of No
Mind as a negation—hence the “No” element of No Mind—it is a pregnant
emptiness. In the Kabbalah, the experience of God in this way is described
as the absolute or mystical “Nothing.” St. John of the Cross refers to it as
todo-y-nada, infinite totality and emptiness.6 Meister Eckhart, too, qualifies
the fullness of God as emptiness.7 And last but not least, Jung intuited the
essential nature of the Self as empty even before his final death experience:
“The whole course of individuation is dialectical, and the so-called ‘end’ is
the confrontation of the ego with the ‘emptiness’ of the center. Here the
limit of possible experience is reached: the ego is dissolved as the referencepoint
of cognition.” Jung defines emptiness as “something unknowable
which is endowed with the highest intensity,” “not as absence or vacancy.”
However, with his death experience, he probably would have no longer
insisted that it was unknowable.
In order to convey a more crisp sense of what this emptiness is, I
would like for the next few minutes to move off the discursive, conceptual
level of language. I’m going to play a piece of shakuhachi flute music, a
Zen art developed by the Fuke school of Zen Buddhism in the practice of
suizen, or blowing meditation. The shakuhachi flute is made from bamboo.
The piece you will hear is called “Matsukaze,” or “Wind in the Pines,”
performed by Stan Richardson. Listen to its emptiness. A brief selection is
available at:
* * * *
In addition to the element of empty oneness, there are a variety of features
one can attribute to the Zen experience, or at least to the process that leads
up to it. Not everybody experiences all of them and there is certainly no
qualification check list or properly correct form. The features I will focus on
here tonight for our purposes are those connected with mortificatio, or inner,
spiritual death.
The first feature I’d like to highlight brings us to Yamada-roshi’s
inhuman laughter. It is, for lack of a better term, Zen madness. This is not
clinical or pathological madness, i.e., insanity, but the madness that comes
from confronting the paradox of the human condition, namely, that we are
mortally limited and human in form, and yet empty and cosmic in essence,
6 Heinrich Dumoulin, Zen Enlightenment: Origins and Meaning, Weatherhill, New York, p. 51.
7 Meister Eckhart, in Meister Eckhart, Harper and Row, New York, Raymond Blakney, p. 85.
and all at the same time. The experience of empty oneness can be a
maddening, mortificatio experience. To realize the profound and infinite
hollowness of the cosmos on an experiential level takes the ground out from
under one’s feet. This aspect of the mysterium tremendum sends one into a
sort of existential free-falling, and one doesn’t know where and if there is a
safety net. As Nietzsche said, “Be careful as you gaze into the abyss. It may
gaze back into you.” And yet, the very thing that makes this experience so
maddening or unnerving is what also makes it humorous, for to discover that
our basic conception of reality is an illusion has a kind of cosmic joke about
it. This is what accounts for the humor of Zen with its pithy and paradoxical
koans or riddles.
Another typical feature is the mortificatio of depression. One may not
immediately associate Zen enlightenment with depression, but one can be
sure that many Zen practitioners have had their share of darkness as part of
their journey of awakening. Certainly, the Buddha could not have been too
happy about the years he spent as an ascetic only to discover that ascetic
practices did nothing to advance enlightenment other than reveal that such
ego-driven practices do not work. Zen depression, like Zen madness, is
existential rather than clinical or chemical, revolving around a sense that life
is meaningless and hopeless. It stems from an awareness of what in
Buddhism is called dukkha, the suffering that is intrinsic to life. Indeed, the
First Noble Truth of the Buddha is, “Life is suffering.”
One should thus not be too surprised that depression figures into Zen
in this sort of way. Furthermore, the very process of the ego awakening to
emptiness—what is referred to as enlightenment, satori, or kensho—
involves an annihilation of that which the ego holds most dear: its belief in
its self-importance. Contrary to what some believe, satori is not the
dissolution or abolishment of the ego. We need an ego—and a welldeveloped
one—in order to survive and thrive. But satori is the
disillusionment or transcendence of the ego’s perspective of itself as
sovereign master of the world, and as other than the world. Satori is the
realization that the ego, too, is empty. Depression can bring us to this
realization precisely because it sinks us—gradually and increasingly—into
emptiness. It helps eat up our narcissism and kill our sense of selfimportance.
The mortificatio of depression bottoms us out into the
emptiness of the cosmos. One may say that coming to enlightenment
through depression, as through any form of Zen mortificatio, is an
experience of the Void gnashing its teeth.
The Zen approach to depression is to work with it the way one works
with a koan. There are different methods of working with koans. In the
Harada-Yasutani school of which Yamada-roshi was the abbot, one does not
attack koans in the traditional way of persistently trying to penetrate their
meaning. Rather, one carries one’s koan lightly, to quote Aitken-roshi, a
Zen master in this school. This means to carefully attend to it and let it
brand itself into one’s consciousness until it unveils itself in an illuminating,
experiential way. Accordingly, one stays with the ‘Is’ of the depression in a
resigned, nonresistant, but curious way. The depression may be deadening,
but is to be coupled with a one-pointedness of mind from focusing on it in
this koan-like manner.
I should add here that this way of working with depression is,
obviously, not incompatible with the Jungian way or any other school of
psychology that genuinely embraces and goes with the pathos rather than
against it. Only its emphasis on eventually seeing through the suffering into
its empty Buddha nature differs in accord with Buddhist phenomenology.
But the notion of immersing oneself into the unconscious, penetrating the
substrata of the depression, and coming through the other side as a somehow
transformed being is similar to the process depicted in the Rosarium pictures
of alchemy; it too is an inner alchemy. In my practice with depressed
patients, I work their depression with them in such a focusing, concentrating
way, going into it deeper and deeper and surrendering to its mystery.
Regardless of whether they are interested in Zen or whether they will ever
have a Zen experience, this meditative approach goes well with the analysis
of their psychic material. If anything, it promotes tolerance of pain and
acceptance of oneself as one is, depression and all. I believe this is
extremely important in psychotherapy, for depression alone never kills
anyone. It is lack or loss of such tolerance and acceptance that leads to
* * * *
Let’s discuss one final and very typical mortificatio feature of the Zen
experience. It is the mortificatio of doubt—profound, existential doubt. It is
referred to as taigi, literally, the “Great Doubt.” In the West, St. John of the
Cross knew this as the “Dark Night of the Soul,” and, as is the case in Zen as
well, it is often merged with the mortificatio of depression. It is a condition
of disillusionment, confusion, and thirst for enlightenment that was
demonstrated par excellence by the Buddha himself in his journey of selfrealization.
The doubt revolves fundamentally around the question, “What
is Buddha-mind?” The Zen patriarch Hakuin believed that the greater the
doubt, the more intense the experience of enlightenment, and he knew how
to push his disciples to the extremes of nagging doubt.8 It is a state of
suspended judgment fostered by zazen and particularly by the koans which
so bewilder and defeat the rational mind or ego. But amidst the suspended
judgment there occurs one-pointedness of mind. These two together—
suspended judgment and one-pointedness of mind—make possible the
breakthrough of empty oneness.
The Zen practitioner is encouraged to surrender him- or herself to this
tantalizing, gripped state of mind, the Great Doubt. He or she is told, “You
must reach the point where you feel as though you had swallowed a red-hot
iron ball that you cannot disgorge despite your every effort.9 Thus, the
mortificatio of Zen has a fiery, calcinatio edge. This deadly, hot, razorsharp
edge that the ego itself becomes is what pierces the Void and releases
the latter into consciousness. A key part of Zen training consists of
sesshin—a week-long intensive immersion into zazen. The student wakes up
at 4:30 in the morning and sits on the cushion till 9:00 at night, 7 days
nonstop except for meals, clean-up, and a half-hour afternoon rest. In the
sesshins I undertook in Japan, Yamada-roshi used to encourage us with
admonitions to attain the Great Doubt, which he described as the “fire of
concentration.” He said we must become like the Vietnamese Zen monks
who protested against the Vietnam War. Many of you might recall the
photographs of them sitting in the lotus posture, lighting themselves on fire
in full public view and dying consciously in a blaze of meditation. Quiet,
dignified, enduring their pain fully awake. No trance state here. This
acutely focused concentration is thus extremely peaceful but extremely
intense at the same time. It is an act of watchful surrender. Death by fire.
In the Great Doubt, one burns off the illusory forms of body and mind,
whether one does so concretely as the Vietnamese monks did or inwardly as
Zen practitioners do everywhere in the world.
* * * *
Let us turn now to Jung’s mortificatio experience, and particularly, its Zen
character. Jung struggled with the issue of the mortificatio of the ego in its
resignation to the Self his entire adult life. Indeed, he is among those
religious geniuses of the ages and the first modern thinker to clearly define it
as a principle of human development or individuation. “. . . [T]he
experience of the self is always a defeat for the ego,”10 he famously said in
8 Dumoulin, op. cit., p. 82.
9 Kapleau, op. cit., p. 79.
10 Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy
(1955-56), Vol. 14 of The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, translated by R.F.C. Hull, Bollingen Series XX,
Princeton University Press, 1963, 1970, par. 778.
Mysterium Coniunctionis. If the experience of the Self does not come easily
due to the obstinacy of the ego, how much more difficult is that more
rarefied and sublime form of self-realization, the experience of empty
oneness? It almost invariably requires a profound mortificatio, either in the
form of near-madness, depression, great doubt, near-death, or death itself.
Certainly, Jung had his fair share of exposure to near-madness and
depression in his lifetime, the former during his reclusive years of
confrontation with the unconscious after his break with Freud, and the latter
on-and-off throughout his life and even well into his advanced years. But
his encounter with emptiness seems to have occurred mostly in relation to
his near-death and dying experiences. The connection between the
experience of empty oneness and near-death and dying experiences is
probably to be expected. Death is the final, absolute release, and in Zen
circles there are stories of people who have had enlightenment experiences
while dying and who lived long enough to report them. Both Zen practice
and the process of dying, or nearly dying, inspire a one-pointedness of mind
and involve a transformation of the ego that makes it possible for the
experience of empty oneness to emerge.
In Jung’s case this is especially evident. To be sure, it needs to be
acknowledged that in his better known writings on Eastern religion Jung was
generally not a great believer in the viability of satori, at least for the
Westerner, and he seemed to question the accuracy of its description as
conveyed even by Easterners. He gave it credence as a subjective
experience, but doubted its veracity as an objective indication of absolute
knowledge. Listen to what he said about it in 1939 in his commentary on
The Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation: “The experience of “at-onement”
is one example of those ‘quick-knowing’ realizations of the East, an
intuition of what it would be like if one could exist and not exist at the same
time. If I were a Moslem, I should maintain that the power of the All-
Compassionate is infinite, and that He alone can make a man to be and not
to be at the same time. But for my part I cannot conceive of such a
possibility. I therefore assume that, in this point, Eastern intuition has
overreached itself."11
In the same year, Jung wrote a foreword to D.T. Suzuki’s Introduction
to Zen Buddhism. There he is more open to the satori experience, but not on
its own terms or the terms of the Zen masters. A careful reading reveals that
he attempts to explain it mechanistically and somewhat reductively. He
11 Psychology and Religion: West and East, Vol. 11 of The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, translated by
R.F.C. Hull, Bollingen Series XX, Princeton University Press, 1958, 1969, 1973, par. 818.
concludes, “Could any of us boast that he believes in the possibility of a
boundlessly paradoxical transformation experience?,”12 and he warns the
Westerner of taking on a method that for various reasons is only suitable to
the Eastern mind. I imagine that Suzuki, the monk and scholar first and
most responsible for bringing Zen to the West and at that time the sole figure
doing so, humbly accepted Jung’s foreword in order to give his work some
authority and exposure, but I also imagine that he didn’t agree with
everything Jung said.
I have written elsewhere extensively about the reasons underlying
Jung’s reticence to accept the satori experience on its own terms, so I won’t
say too much about that here. Suffice it to say that these reasons include: 1.
Jung’s epistemological orientation as influenced by Kant, who asserted that
the “thing-in-itself,” and by extension the unconsious-in-itself and the
transcendent-in-itself, cannot be directly perceived or known. It is, Jung
claims, “only by indirect means” such as dreams, fantasies, and visions that
the unconscious and transcendent can be known.13 2. Jung’s reticence was
influenced by his psychiatric orientation which upholds that without the
center of an ego, the contents of the unconscious will invade and extinguish
consciousness and likely lead to a psychosis. The Jungian and Freudian
views here are basically two sides of the same coin, the former attributing
the experience of oneness to an ego overreaching itself and the latter
reducing it to the ego’s regression to the oceanic womb state; the one sees
this experience as beyond the ego and the other as before the ego. Although
both agree with the Buddhist view that in oneness the ego returns to its
essential, original condition of unity with the unconscious, they do not
accept, as Buddhism does, that the ego—the ego that is strong and welldeveloped,
that is—can endure this without dissolution. And, finally, 3.
Jung’s initial position on satori was influenced, naturally, by the
Weltanschauung of Western civilization, which is rooted in a fundamental
schism or split between man and God as conveyed through the biblical fall
of Adam. Jung’s reservations about Western mystics such as Meister
Eckhart, who claimed to have overcome this schism, were similar to those
he had about Eastern mystics.
Things began to shift with Jung’s 1944 heart attack and brush with
death. Firstly, there was the vision Jung had during the episode itself. He
saw himself, on a huge meteor-like rock in outer space, enter the
antechamber of a seemingly Eastern temple with a black Hindu sitting
12 Ibid., par. 902.
13 Ibid., par. 774.
silently in lotus posture to the side of the antechamber’s entrance. He
writes: “I had the feeling that everything was being sloughed away;
everything I aimed at or wished for or thought, the whole phantasmagoria of
earthly existence, fell away or was stripped from me—an extremely painful
process. . . . This experience gave me a feeling of extreme poverty, but at the
same time of great fullness. There was no longer anything I wanted or
desired. I existed in an objective form.”14 Clearly, this was a mortificatio
experience, happening in an Eastern imagistic context. The diminishment or
impoverishment had a Zenlike emptying character, and thus the emptying in
turn led to fullness.
Shortly after this episode, Jung had a dream that seemed to pick up
where his near-death experience left off, for in the above vision, he never in
fact entered the temple because his doctor, or the image of his doctor, came
to bring him back to life. In this dream, Jung was on a hiking trip and came
upon a small chapel which he entered. He writes: “. . . I saw that on the
floor in front of the altar, facing me, sat a yogi—in lotus posture, in deep
meditation. When I looked at him more closely, I realized that he had my
face. I started in profound fright, and awoke with the thought: ‘Aha, so he
is the one who is meditating me. He has a dream, and I am it.’ I knew that
when he awakened, I would no longer be.”15 Needless to say, this dream has
profound implications. The yogi is both Jung’s alter ego—no pun
intended—and the Self. In typical Eastern fashion, the dream conveys the
Hindu and Buddhist idea that the Self alone is real, and the ego but a passing
mirage. Jung’s piercing statement, “I knew that when he awakened, I would
no longer be,” works with both forms of mortificatio, the form of living
consciously with death on a day-to-day basis, and the form of actually dying.
The person in whom the Self has become awakened and who lives life in a
more or less awake state knows that the ego no longer exists the way it was
originally conditioned, that is, as an isolated, separate entity and identity
unto its own. And of course, the person who is dying may well be
predisposed or inclined to soon discover the same in a more complete and
ultimate manner.
* * * *
It was either during his final encounter with death or approaching it that
Jung’s most transformative experience vis-à-vis Eastern religion seems to
have occurred. Of course, this experience happened too late for him to write
about. What we know is that on his deathbed, Jung was reading Charles
14 Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Vintage Books, Random House, New York, 1961, 1965, pp. 290-291.
15 Ibid., p. 323.
Luk’s Ch’an and Zen Teachings: First Series. This is the first of a series of
three highly sophisticated books. Luk was a Chinese monk and scholar
involved in keeping alive one of the few remaining Zen or Ch’an sects in
China in the last century. He studied under the renowned master Hsu Yun.
Included in the book are Hsu Yun’s discourses to the monks in the
monastery of which he was abbot. These discourses were given during an
intensive retreat like the kind I mentioned earlier. If one is in a state of
Great Doubt or some other form of mortificatio, and has one-pointedness of
mind such as the kind ushered in when one is dying, a master’s poignant
discourse—the way he says something or emphasizes a certain phrase—can
itself be a trigger for satori. Very likely, however, Jung, a master in his own
right, may have already at this point been familiar with the satori state, and
he may have been merely reading and reconfirming what he already knew.
He was, after all, not only dying, but concluding a most astounding and
historic journey of consciousness, much of it couched, no doubt, in the
language of alchemy, but a significant part of it, as the above vision and
dream illustrated, in the wisdom of the East.
And what tells us that Jung was already familiar with satori if not
actually in a satori state? He does. Too weak to write anything himself, he
asked Marie-Louise von Franz, who was among the few at his bedside
during this time, to write Luk a letter. I quote von Franz: “. . . he was
enthusiastic. . . . When he read what Hsu Yun said, he sometimes felt as if he
himself could have said exactly this! It was just ‘it’!”16 “It” is in italics and
also with an exclamation mark, apparently connoting the Unconscious of
Zen. When Jung met at this same time with his friend Miguel Serrano, he
told him the following, and I quote Jung from Serrano’s notes: “I have just
finished reading a book by a Chinese Zen Buddhist. I felt as if we were
talking about one and the same thing and were simply using different words
for it. The use of the word ‘unconscious’ is not the decisive thing; what
counts is the Idea that lies behind this word.”17 Can Jung here be referring
to anything else but the central Idea of Zen, the Doctrine of No Mind, the
Void? Clearly, these reflections occurring in Jung’s final days convey a
sense of enthusiasm and conviction absent in his earlier writings on the East.
* * * *
Let us now turn to the Oxherding Pictures, Zen’s counterpart to the
Rosarium pictures and an itinerary, so to speak, to the Zen experience of
mortificatio. Although to be accurate, it should be said, as is the case with
16 Kapleau, op. cit., p. xi.
17 Gerhard Wehr, Jung: A Biography, Shambhala, Boston, London, 2001, p. 449.
the Rosarium pictures, the Oxherding Pictures are not just about death.
They are about death and rebirth. It must be emphasized that the Oxherding
Pictures are ultimately about being reborn into a life that is lived with the
living knowledge of empty oneness. It is not just about the initial
enlightenment experience or awakening to empty oneness, i.e., satori, which
is usually a peak experience that settles, but about the practical life one has
to then lead in the aftermath of that experience and integrating that
experience. Seeing emptiness is thus only the beginning; leading a life in
accord with emptiness is another matter, and the true goal of Zen.
To begin, I should say, firstly, that what I will present to here is a very
brief sketch, without the commentary and poetry that accompany each
picture. For those of you interested in a fuller treatment, D.T. Suzuki’s
writings may be considered a primary source, and Marvin Spiegelman and
Mokusen Miyuki also provide an interesting treatment of these pictures in
their book Buddhism and Jungian Psychology. Secondly, there is more than
one set of the Oxherding Pictures, each with its own unique advantages. I
will tonight use the set that has gained the widest acceptance today, the set
attributed to the 12th century Chinese Zen master Kuo-an Shih-yuan, or
Kakuan Shien in Japanese. Moreover, I will use a modern version of it in
the form of ink-and-brush paintings by Gyokusei Jikihara (available at Earlier sets in
China show the ox gradually turning from black to white, signifying that the
ultimate goal of Zen is the realization and increasing integration of
emptiness. The gradual quality of this speaks to the Soto school’s emphasis
on gradual enlightenment, as opposed to the sudden enlightenment of the
Rinzai school of Zen. In Jungian language, one could say that this whitening
represents a progressive diminishment of shadow, shadow not in the sense of
personal or archetypal shadow, but simply in the sense of what the ego does
not see in regard to enlightenment. Also, other sets present each picture as a
circle within a square, suggesting that the Unconscious or Self must be
integrated into consciousness—a principle known in alchemy, with some
subtle variations in nuance, as “squaring the circle.”
Let’s look at the first picture. It is called “Seeking the Ox.” The ox
represents the seeker’s true nature, that is, Buddha nature or Buddha-mind,
the Self. It is probably because of the ox’s sacred nature in ancient India
that it came to symbolize man’s primal nature or Buddha-mind. The
oxherder here, however, knows himself only as small mind, as an ego. He
sets out in search of enlightenment, but in fact, his original nature has never
gone astray—he just can’t see it. What blocks enlightenment are the
defilements of the ego—its desires, fears, and delusions of duality. As the
Hindu sage Meher Baba said, “The ego sees what is not there, and does not
see what is there.” But herein lies the paradox: If the oxherder doesn’t see
the ox, how does he know it even exists? How does he even know to seek
it? It is the Self from the very beginning that seeks itself, that inspires the
urge to realization. The whole process occurs under the auspices of the Self.
Let us go to Picture Two. Entitled “Finding the Tracks,” it is fairly
self-explanatory. Basically, in this picture, Dorothy is on the Yellow Brick
Road to Oz. At least on an intellectual level, the ego knows that there is
such a thing as the Self, similar to the early phase of analysis in which the
patient is seeking and trusting that something will help him or her but does
not know what it is.
Turning to the third picture, it is called “”First Glimpse of the Ox.”
This picture indicates the threshold of satori, the point at which onepointedness
of mind is so strong and clear that there are real hints of Buddha
nature. Enlightenment is glimpsed, but not yet fully crystallized and
experienced. This is a peculiar, in-between state, and often the Zen
practitioner thinks he or she has realized emptiness when in fact he or she is
perceiving it, as the picture illustrates, in an obscured way.
Picture Four is called “Catching the Ox.” It celebrates the experience
of satori, enlightenment. Emptiness is clearly perceived and apprehended
by consciousness. But it is not yet fully comprehended, not yet integrated
into everyday life. Grasping emptiness is thus tantamount to realization, but
not actualization, at least not as of yet. The aim of Zen is to embody
emptiness in one’s daily existence. This picture marks the culmination of
the initial phase of Zen training.
Picture Five is “Taming the Ox,” the beginning of working with one’s
realization in a practical, applied way. It portrays the struggle to integrate
empty oneness into everyday life. One wrestles with one’s thoughts and
desires. But even they arise from Buddha nature, and it is only because the
delusions of the ego still persist that they are imagined to be real. The
process of working through this subjective state of delusion is undertaken
via the study of the Mumonkan, the 48 koans that comprise the main text of
Zen training.
Picture Six is “Riding the Ox Home.” Kakuan’s commentary tells all:
“The struggle is over, ‘gain’ and ‘loss’ no longer affect [the oxherder]. He
hums the rustic tune of the woodsman and plays the simple songs of the
village children. Astride the Ox’s back, he gazes serenely at the clouds
above. His head does not turn [in the direction of temptations]. Try though
one may to upset him, he remains undisturbed.”
Picture Seven is called “Ox Forgotten, Self Alone.” The term “Self”
here refers to the Self-realized ego. At this stage, the relations between the
ego and the Self are transcended. “Self” is no longer other, and what occurs
now and henceforth is beyond such dualistic relations, beyond
“betweenness.” The oxherder has embodied emptiness; he has, so to speak,
made it his own. If the first six pictures are about the relations between the
ego and the Self, the latter four represent the movement toward sheer
emptiness, first without an awareness of the Self as other, and then, as we
shall see in the next picture, without even an awareness of oneself as the
embodiment of emptiness, for any such awareness can only be from a
distance and hence a form of separation from empty oneness.
Picture Eight, “Both Ox and Self Forgotten,” is then true empty
oneness. Even the act of emptying and the sense of emptiness have been
thrown out. Now that’s really empty! The ego has been bottomed out, and
only the bottomless Void remains. Of this end to egocentricity, Kakuan
writes, “If hundreds of birds were now to strew flowers about [the
oxherder’s] room, he could not but feel ashamed of himself.” What a
humility and “poverty of spirit”—as the Christian mystics call it—this
statement reveals. In Zen, there are three levels of enlightenment or
emptiness. The first is dropping off body and mind. Pictures One to Seven
correspond to this. The second level is dropping off dropping body and
mind. This corresonds to Pictures Eight and Nine. And the final picture is
dropping off dropping off. Picture Eight here denotes the peeling process
that razes the ego down to nothingness. Notice its resemblance to the
ouroboros—the primal beginning, infinity, but also death. [Click to: ] To give up not only the
attachments of the body and mind but even the attachment to the rewarding
feeling of giving up involves a real mortificatio. As Bob Dylan sings,
“When you think that you’ve lost everything, you find out you could always
lose a little more. . . . I close my eyes and wonder if everything is as hollow
as it seems.”18
Picture Nine is called “Returning to the Source.” Here the oxherder is
simply what is. He has returned to the origin of all, not in any particular
form or state of distinctness, but simply as what naturally exists in the form
of life itself, just as it is. As he nears the final stage of his Zen journey, he
finds himself back at the beginning, but with a new consciousness. This
process is conveyed in the Zen saying that Donovan made famous when he
sang, “First there is a mountain, then there is no mountain, then there is.”
18 “Tryin’ to Get to Heaven,” Time Out of Mind, Sony Music Entertainment/Columbia Records, 1997.
One sees the world, then one realizes one does not see the world, then one
sees the world. And seeing the world exactly as it is, endlessly changing and
with nothing to strive for, including enlightenment, the oxherder is able to
fully yet selflessly enter it.
Picture Ten is thus called “Entering the Market With Helping Hands.”
The summum bonum of the Zen process of death and rebirth, it reflects
individuation as Jung himself understood it: the oxherder, here transfigured
into the jovial or laughing Buddha, is an in-dividual in the sense that he is
undivided not only within himself but from the world. Unlike the yogi who
remains in his cave in permanent retreat from the world, or the Hinayana
Buddhist monk who must be a saintlike paragon of virtue, the Zen
bodhisattva returns to the world, inhabiting it now as easily as he dwelled in
his hut in Picture Seven. Zen teaching warns against sinking into an
emptiness or enlightenment that becomes static, that hasn’t dropped off
dropping off. “True Zen does not smell of Zen,” the sages tell us, by which
they mean it does not smell of enlightenment or some kind of lofty sanctity.
True Zen is ordinary, not extraordinary. Chop wood, carry water, see
patients. In ancient China, gourds were commonly used as wine bottles,
signifying in this picture the enlightened man’s ordinariness as opposed to
otherworldliness. The Zen master then is a free spirit who un-selfconsciously
embodies empty oneness and can go anywhere, bringing his
ordinary Zen into the world, partaking in the community and marketplace,
and helping his fellow human beings live in the Way of the Buddha simply
by virtue of his own example.
* * * *
To conclude tonight’s presentation, there is a parable of somebody who
knocks on the door of God’s private chamber. God says, “Who’s there?”
The person responds, “It is I.” God says, “Go away.” The person goes
away. Sometime later he returns and knocks again. God asks, “Who’s
there?” The person says, “It is Thou.” God replies, “Come in.” It would
seem that what has occurred here in this parable, between the person’s two
visits to God’s chamber, is the greater mortificatio, the mortificatio in which
the ego dies in its sense of separateness from the Self. I say “sense” of
separateness because, as Zen teaches, the ego in fact never was or is separate
from the Self; it only thinks it is. So the question then becomes, What is it
that goes through a mortificatio if all that really dies is an illusion to begin
with? In true Zen spirit, the topic of this paper has been about nothing at all.
I hope you didn’t expect more. Thank you.

Tricycle » Knowing the story doesn’t solve it's picture

[...] few days ago I posted an interview with Jack Kornfiled and said I’d post an earlier interview with him soon. Well, [...]

Kim Knuth's picture

I just love the statement, "Less religion, more practice". I see far too much talking the talk instead of walking the walk. And, I'd like to thank this man, Jack and his offspring teachers, for teaching me so much in my early days of practice. And, even though my teacher for some years now has been Jason Siff...(I just don't agree anymore with not allowing thoughts into practice for it so part of this human form...and how can we truly see the conditioning of our emotions and thought habits without this inclusion??) ...I've found the shifting with Jason's approach to practice much more organic and transforming by finding much more compassion for myself and all of my being human (thought habits and all) which has spilled out onto others. However, this does not lessen my gratitude to Jack Kornfield and his fellow teachers for my early learning.

Cris Holanda's picture

Practice is only meditation or meditation is only one of the aspects of practice?

Need reasons why Freedom of Press better than Freedom of Rel's picture

[...] Tricycle » Less religion, more practice [...]

Bhikkhu Cintita Dinsmore's picture

I find the title intriguing: Less Religion, More Practice? Isn't this like saying, Less Car, More Driving? I realize everyone has a different definition for Religion, and that there is no such concept native to Buddhism, so maybe it doesn't matter, but what understanding of Religion puts Religion in opposition to Practice?

Twitter Trackbacks for Tricycle » Less religion, more practi's picture

[...] Tricycle » Less religion, more practice – view page – cached Posted by James Shaheen in : Buddhism, Buddhist Teachings, Interview, Meditation, Mindfulness, Theravada , trackback Tweets about this link Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['thomaswmiller'] = {"photo":"","url":"","nick":"thomaswmiller"}; thomaswmiller: “RT @tricyclemag: Less religion, more practice: ” 5 minutes ago retweet Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['markjasonflores'] = {"photo":"","url":"","nick":"markjasonflores"}; markjasonflores: “RT @jimparedes: RT @tricyclemag: Less religion, more practice: ” 22 minutes ago retweet Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['mykell24'] = {"photo":"","url":"","nick":"mykell24"}; mykell24: “Less religion. more relationship! RT @jimparedes: RT @tricyclemag: Less religion, more practice: ” 23 minutes ago retweet Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['joblesswapster'] = {"photo":"","url":"","nick":"joblesswapster"}; joblesswapster: “RT @jimparedes: RT @tricyclemag: Less religion, more practice: ” 24 minutes ago retweet Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['jimparedes'] = {"photo":"","url":"","nick":"jimparedes"}; jimparedesHighly Influential: “RT @tricyclemag: Less religion, more practice: ” 24 minutes ago retweet Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['schwartzwriter'] = {"photo":"","url":"","nick":"schwartzwriter"}; schwartzwriter: “RT @tricyclemag: Less religion, more practice: ” 28 minutes ago retweet Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['zenofbass'] = {"photo":"","url":"","nick":"zenofbass"}; zenofbassInfluential: “RT @tricyclemag: Less religion, more practice: ” 29 minutes ago retweet Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['tricyclemag'] = {"photo":"","url":"","nick":"tricyclemag"}; tricyclemagHighly Influential: “Less religion, more practice: ” 49 minutes ago retweet Filter tweets [...]