March 04, 2013

Is Indian Citizenship the Next Step for Tibetans in Exile?

Alex Caring-Lobel

In 1959 the 14th Dalai Lama fled Tibet to settle in India, where then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru provided him and his followers assistance. Since then, over 150,000 Tibetans have followed in their leader’s footsteps, settling into camps across the country—the biggest democracy in the world. These settlements, like the Tibetan people’s stay in India, were not supposed to last.

In a recent article for The Asian Age, journalist Maura Moynihan writes about the structural crisis now unfolding in the Tibetan-exile world.

The old settlements are disintegrating, filled with poor, often broken families who are frustrated with policies that consign them to isolation and exclusion by prolonging their unsettled legal status.

As China increases military pressure along the India-China border and accelerates conflict in the Himalayan belt, Tibetan refugees are more vulnerable, less welcome and politically radioactive. In an era where there is less room and tolerance for refugees in all of South Asia, approximately 150,000 Tibetans in exile cannot remain stateless refugees much longer. At 54 years, Tibet is second to the Palestinians as the world’s longest unresolved refugee crisis. At this late date, Tibetans in exile want and need citizenship.”

Currently under Indian law, Tibetans are granted RCs, registration cards that categorize them as foreigners—not refugees. This precarious identification affords Tibetans in exile neither refugee status, which would grant them rights under international treaty law, nor legal government representation. As non-citizens, Tibetans cannot own property or register their own businesses.

Not seeking citizenship has, for the most part, been regarded by older Tibetan exiles as necessary for the survival of Tibetan culture and the eventual passage of exiles back into Tibet. This is known as the policy of non-assimilation, and while it may have made sense 50 years ago, it now requires revisiting. If Tibetans are rendered helpless as refugees, what help can they be to Tibetans still in Tibet? “At this late date,” Moynihan argues, “Tibetans with citizenship can do more for the Tibetan cause than impoverished and powerless foreigners.”

Though the case for Indian Citizenship shares many of the same goals as the non-assimilation camp, it will certainly be met with much resistance within the Tibetan exile government. Its head, Lobsang Sangay, maintains that Tibetans must remain refugees in order to serve the Tibetan cause, echoing the position of the previous head, Ven. Samdhong Rinpoche, a renowned scholar and devout monk who was often criticized for his conservative policies.

Conservatism and orthodoxy have long plagued Tibetan governance. Following the death of the 13th Dalai Lama in the 1930s, conservative forces took power, leading the nation into a long period of stagnation in which social inequality increased. Modernization efforts were abandoned. Ironically enough, this period in which aristocrats exercised inordinate power aligns with that oft-romanticized vision of Tibet, a time when orthodox Buddhist ritual was likely the last solace available to the vast majority of Tibetans. By the time it became clear that the Chinese threat required a concerted response it was too late to modernize the military.

Let’s hope that Tibetan politics sheds the long reign of conservatism, which made Tibet so vulnerable to invasion in the first place. It’s refreshing to see new, radical ideas like that of Indian citizenship come onto the scene. The Dalai Lama may have retired and the new government head might don a suit instead of robes, but real change is going to spring from novel ideas like this one.

 

A more in-depth version of Moynihan's recent article appeared in Tibetan Political Review, here.

Image: On March 28, 1959, three days before reaching sanctuary in northern India, the Dalai Lama's escape party crosses Karpo Pass on horseback.

Share with a Friend

Email to a Friend

Already a member? Log in to share this content.

You must be a Tricycle Community member to use this feature.

1. Join as a Basic Member

Signing up to Tricycle newsletters will enroll you as a free Tricycle Basic Member.You can opt out of our emails at any time from your account screen.

2. Enter Your Message Details

Enter multiple email addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Will.Rowe's picture

Forced abortions, forced sterilizations, one child policy enforced, Noble Peace Prize recipient in prison, one party rule by Communist Party, no right to protest; a Buddhist in India is far better off than one under Communist Chinese totalitarianism.

aewhitehouse's picture

Alex,

You have lived in KTM, I have only visited. My friends over there don't have much to say directly about the situation, so I can very much appreciate your added insight. I will strive to find a more holistic set of facts on the matter.

Metta.

aewhitehouse's picture

There are 20,000 Tibetan refugees in Nepal with no status. I hope the Nepali government will defy pressures from China and grant these Tibetans rights of education, work, and travel.

Alex Caring-Lobel's picture

If India began granting citizenship to Tibetans, I think Nepal would have to respond.

aewhitehouse's picture

Alex,

Problem is that in Nepal the Maoists are in control of the Nepalese political structure, and if nothing was done under the previous monarchy, then unfortunately I think it will get worse under a government that is more beholden to China than before. Witness the conduct of the Nepalese government against the Tibetans during the 2011/2012 demonstrations.

http://articles.cnn.com/2012-02-21/asia/world_asia_china-tibet-nepal_1_t...

The Maoists are also fomenting anti-India sentiment within the country over ancient border and cultural issues, and it seems that India is also losing a "bidding war" to China over implied allegiances, not to mention the West Seti dam project being built by the Three Gorges International Company which once complete will provide 750 MW of power to ease crippling load shedding problems across the country.

It is my thought that for the foreseeable future Nepal will continue to kowtow to the Chinese government until a government more representative of ALL Nepalis is in place. So yes, they may have to respond, but not in the way that we might hope.

Alex Caring-Lobel's picture

aewhitehouse,
The Maoists are not the problem in this regard. Nepal is a tiny, dirt-poor country sandwiched between two superpowers. Its policies and governance have largely been victim to the whim of Indian and Chinese interests for a very long time. The current communist PM, Baburam Bhattarai, has actually been accused repeatedly of working for India's interests - not China's. Some even suspected that India was pulling the strings to secure his appointment as PM the summer before the last. (I was living in Kathmandu at the time.) There is, however, a faction of Maoists sympathetic to China's interests. The party has recently become fractured along these lines.
The people of Nepal elected Baburam Bhattarai by a huge margin - one unprecedented in presidential politics here in the US. The Nepali people want socialism. They want communism. A socialist government IS representative of Nepali people. They have shed a lot of blood to get this point.
Nepali police are quite brutal in their confrontations against protesters. I have seen them harass and fuck up proper Nepali citizens for no good reason. Friends from KTM have been telling me how now there has been a recent wave of police beating up and cutting the hair of unorthodox looking youths - those men with tattoos or with long hair. What of the Nepali people? It often seems that the Tibetan cause has been so blindly championed by Western liberals as to obscure other ongoing injustices far more entrenched or institutionalized.
Whenever there is any large gathering of any kind, even a festival or religious celebration, the Nepali police are present, in riot gear, en masse.